We are interested in proposing a special issue of the journal Food Policy focused on the idea of "zero". By zero, we consider public and private food safety regulations, standards, and grades that impose an expectation of zero presence of substances like residues (antibiotics or pesticides), genetically modified organisms (GMOs), E. coli, gluten, transfats, etc. Zero tolerance of defects or production practices also has a role in food quality, and we consider this type of zero in our definition.
As stipulated by Food Policy, we are looking for "an authoritative review of current thinking and debates in a particular area of food policy, that at the same time takes these debates forward..." To this end, we want to explore the challenges of defining, detecting, and stipulating zero and the constant chase to attain perfection in an imperfect world. Possible research questions include: How does our historical or current conception of zero affect our future understanding or implementations of zero tolerance policies? What are the effects of zero on consumers, producers, regulators and the supply chain? Who is calling for zero, and who is most affected by the regulation? Why do we search for zero? How does the quest for purity differentially affect the way agents perceive the affected foods, the related production processes and value chains? What are the unintended consequences of zero? How does quality or safety change as a result of such policies?
The issue of zero does not fit squarely in a single discipline; therefore, we are looking for articles from the social and bio-physical sciences. Contributions from the humanities about the ethical implications of zero or historical perspectives are greatly appreciated. Interdisciplinary works are particularly interesting for this effort. The diverse disciplinary approaches prompt a diversity of methods to address zero. Therefore, we solicit various methodological approaches to the research questions. New conceptual/theoretical pieces, rigorous empirical modeling and insightful case studies are particularly desirable and useful for this special issue. We are also interested in analysis from the perspective of different countries and regions. In the end we intend to advance the understanding of zero and provide indicators of the future of these policies.
We are soliciting paper ideas. The papers do NOT have to be written, but we need a brief description of the paper (250 word limit), how the paper will address a selected research question, and how it advances our knowledge of zero. If you have published extensively in this area, please indicate the new contribution of your proposed paper. Upon acceptance of the proposal, we will expect completed papers within six months. If you submit a paper, we also expect that you will serve as a reviewer in the double-blind review process. The papers are to average 6000 words (including abstract, appendices, tables, etc.) with a total issue word limit of 45,000-50,000.
By September 30, 2011, please send us a brief paper description that outlines the research question, discipline, method or theoretical perspective, as well as the contribution of the proposed paper. As this is a review process, we will use your descriptions to develop the proposal and send it on to Food Policy for review. For more information on the review process for special issues in Food Policy please review: http://www.elsevier.com/framework_products/promis_misc/3031foodpol.doc.
Norbert L. W. Wilson & Micelle R. Worosz
Auburn University
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology
(o) 1 334 844 5616; 1 334 844 5682